How do organizations balance automation and human analysis in CTI, ensuring that automated tools identify potential threats while human analysts provide context and decision-making?
Share
Questions & Answers Board – CyberSecurity
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
How do organizations balance automation and human analysis in CTI, ensuring that automated tools identify potential threats while human analysts provide context and decision-making?
Organizations can balance automation and human analysis in Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) by integrating automated tools for faster identification of potential threats with human analysts who can provide context, in-depth analysis, and decision-making capabilities. Automated tools can be used to collect and process large volumes of data quickly, flagging potential threats based on predefined parameters and patterns. Human analysts then review the alerts generated by automated tools, investigate them further, and provide the necessary context by considering the organization’s specific environment and threat landscape. They can leverage their expertise to conduct detailed analysis, understand the implications of the threats, and make informed decisions on how to respond effectively. By combining the speed and efficiency of automation with the critical thinking and adaptability of human analysts, organizations can enhance their overall cyber resilience and threat detection capabilities.