What are the key differences between digital risk protection and traditional IT security, and why are both essential for comprehensive protection?
What are the differences between digital risk protection and traditional IT security measures?
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Digital risk protection focuses on identifying and mitigating risks associated with an organization’s digital footprint, such as monitoring for data leaks, brand impersonation, and other online threats beyond the traditional network perimeter. It involves proactive monitoring, threat intelligence, and response capabilities to protect against a wide range of cyber risks.
Traditional IT security, on the other hand, typically focuses on securing the network, endpoints, and infrastructure through measures like firewalls, antivirus software, and intrusion detection systems. It is more reactive and aims to prevent attacks from penetrating the network or accessing sensitive data.
Both digital risk protection and traditional IT security are essential for comprehensive protection because they address different aspects of cybersecurity. While traditional IT security measures are crucial for safeguarding the network and endpoints from known threats, digital risk protection is necessary to proactively identify and respond to emerging risks that may target an organization’s digital presence.
By combining both approaches, organizations can create a layered defense strategy that addresses a broader range of cyber threats and vulnerabilities, providing more comprehensive protection against evolving cyber risks.
Would you like more details on any specific aspect?