What are the main differences between responding to potential threats proactively versus reactively handling incidents?
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Proactively responding to potential threats involves taking preventive actions to mitigate risks before they escalate, such as implementing security measures, conducting security awareness training, and performing regular security assessments. On the other hand, reactively handling incidents involves responding to threats or security breaches after they have already occurred, often involving immediate actions to contain and investigate the incident, and then implementing measures to prevent similar incidents in the future. Proactive approaches aim to minimize the likelihood of incidents, while reactive responses are triggered after incidents have occurred to minimize their impact and prevent recurrence.