What are the main differences between responding to potential threats proactively versus reactively handling incidents?
Share
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
When responding to potential threats proactively, organizations take preventive measures to identify and mitigate risks before they escalate into incidents. This approach involves implementing security controls, conducting risk assessments, and training employees to identify and respond to potential threats.
On the other hand, reacting to incidents involves responding to security breaches, data leaks, or other threats after they have occurred. This may involve containment, eradication, and recovery efforts to minimize the impact of the incident.
Proactive handling allows organizations to be more prepared and potentially avoid incidents altogether, while reactive handling focuses on response and recovery after the threat has already materialized.